lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    SubjectRe: a quest for a better scheduler
    From
    Timothy D. Witham wrote :
    [...]
    > I propose that we work on setting up a straight forward test harness
    > that allows developers to quickly test a kernel patch against
    > various performance yardsticks.

    [...
    (proposed large server testbeds)
    ...]


    OK, so I have received some feedback on my proposal to provide a
    reference set of machines so that any kernel modifications could be
    checked across a range of machines and a range of tests. It was
    pointed out that there are lots of smaller servers out there and
    they should be part of any test plan. There was also some concern
    that a 4 way server didn't add any value in a test lineup. But I
    have to think that with the number of 4 ways out there they should
    be included.

    One additional piece of feedback was that any comprehensive
    characterization plan should include desktops, tablet devices and
    older machines and the performance tests that address those
    configurations usage models and I agree that it is something that
    needs to be done. But as for providing hardware for that effort the
    OSDL is not the group to do that. Hopefully somebody with an
    interest in these configurations will step forward to do that
    portion of the job.

    So the server hardware configurations have evolved to look like
    the following.

    1 way, 512 MB, 2 IDE
    2 way, 1 GB, 10 SCSI (1 SCSI channel)
    4 way, 4 GB, 20 SCSI (2 channels)
    8 way, 8 GB, 40 SCSI (4 channels) maybe Fibre Channel (FC)
    16 way, 16 GB, 80 FC (8 channels)

    The types of server applications that I have heard people express concern are:

    Web infrastructure:
    Apache (SPECWEB99???)
    TUX (SPECWEB99???)
    Jabber (have their own)

    Corporate infrastructure:
    NFS (SPECSFS2.0???)
    raw TCP/IP performance
    Samba (Have their own)
    email (SPECMAIL2001???)

    Database performance:
    Raw storage I/O performance (various)
    OLTP workload (something like TPC-C???)
    OLAP workload

    General usage:
    compile speed (usually measured by kernel compile)


    Further comments? I will start contacting folks who have expressed
    interest.
    --
    Timothy D. Witham - Lab Director - wookie@osdlab.org
    Open Source Development Lab Inc - A non-profit corporation
    15275 SW Koll Parkway - Suite H - Beaverton OR, 97006
    (503)-626-2455 x11 (office) (503)-702-2871 (cell)
    (503)-626-2455 (fax)

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:24    [W:4.582 / U:0.312 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site