lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Zerocopy implementation issues
On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 04:06:16AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> I understand that you are frustruated about this and it
> requires you to touch some delicate assembly. But I'm
> going to be blunt and say "tough", because everyone has
> to implement this correctly. Just do it and get it
> over with.

I'm doing it _NOW_, but I'm having to rotate the checksum
at the end if dst & 1, only to have it unrotated in an
inefficient manner in csum_block_*. Seems a bit of a
waste of CPU cycles.

--
Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:1.120 / U:0.616 seconds]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site