lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Zerocopy implementation issues
    On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 04:06:16AM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
    > I understand that you are frustruated about this and it
    > requires you to touch some delicate assembly. But I'm
    > going to be blunt and say "tough", because everyone has
    > to implement this correctly. Just do it and get it
    > over with.

    I'm doing it _NOW_, but I'm having to rotate the checksum
    at the end if dst & 1, only to have it unrotated in an
    inefficient manner in csum_block_*. Seems a bit of a
    waste of CPU cycles.

    --
    Russell King (rmk@arm.linux.org.uk) The developer of ARM Linux
    http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/personal/aboutme.html

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.021 / U:60.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site