[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: question regarding cpu selection
    On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:13:12PM +0200, you [Erik Mouw] claimed:
    > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 11:32:51PM +0300, Ville Herva wrote:
    > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2001 at 09:28:48PM -0400, you [Duncan Gauld] claimed:
    > > > I would supply a patch, but I don't know how to write such a thing :)
    > >
    > > It seems Erik Mouw already submitted a patch, altough I agree that "Celeron
    > > II" might be a better name for the thing than "Celeron (Coppermine)".
    > So what about this one? This time I had to change and
    > setup.c as well to reflect the changes in :)

    Hmm. I just checked Intel's web site (should've done so earlier), and it
    appears that Intel still dubs the new revision as "Celeron", although I'm
    sure it was introduced as CeleronII in some sources (try So I'll just have admit that your
    first patch was technically correct, and I was wrong. Sorry for the

    I still think "Celeron II" is clearer, but heaven knows what Intel will sell
    by that name three years from now (just think of i860).

    -- v --
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.024 / U:144.860 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site