[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Single user linux

    On Thu, 26 Apr 2001 wrote:
    > you're right, we could do it in more than one way. like copying
    > with mcopy without mounting a fat disk. the question is where to put it.
    > why we do it is an important thing.
    > taking place as a clueless user, i think i should be able to do anything.
    > i'd be happy to accept proof that multi-user is a solution for
    > clueless user, not because it's proven on servers. but because it is
    > a solution by definition.

    I think you have it backwards here, given that Linux works one way and you
    want it to work another. Basically, I would suggest that it is up to you
    to prove that multi-user is NOT a solution for "clueless" user, especially
    given that there have been a number of suggestions on how to do it without
    changing the kernel or even changing software.

    If you can't prove the case, I rather suspect that your patch won't make
    it. Don't feel bad though, I've yet to get one through either. :o)


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 12:52    [W:0.028 / U:8.680 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site