Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:55:09 -0400 | From | "Eric S. Raymond" <> | Subject | Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a better attribution system |
| |
Giacomo A. Catenazzi <cate@dplanet.ch>: > We should use the same filed name of CREDITS e.g. D: for Description. > (maybe you can invert D: description and T: time of last update)
Good point.
> It whould nice also if we include the type of the license (GPL,...). > This for a fast parsing (and maybe also to replace the few lines > of license)
Is there any kernel code that isn't GPLed?
> Instead of C: it is more important (IMHO) to include the module name.
That we get from the name of the file we're visiting, I think.
> Maybe we can include both (modules name are always lower case). > I think that the inclusion of the config option is not important ( > considering that it can be easily parsed from the kaos' new makefiles).
Interesting point. Maybe that field should drop out once we transition. -- <a href="http://www.tuxedo.org/~esr/">Eric S. Raymond</a>
A right is not what someone gives you; it's what no one can take from you. -- Ramsey Clark - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |