[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernel merge issues
james rich wrote:

> Hi folks,
> I'm sure many here have read the discussion on lkml about lvm and
> the problems that team is having. As part of that discussion it was said:

I'm not entirely familiar with the issues surrounding lvm development, I know
are not in good shape right now.

But I would say the following statement is unrealistic.
Trying to manage a large software project without source code control is
an even bigger nightmare than with source code control.
patch is NOT a source code control tool.
In fact a good source code control system would allow patch incremental
This is actually one glaring limitation of CVS, the ability group a set of
together, aka "mod"
(Bitkeeper has addressed a lot of these issues; it can generate or accept
patch sets)

The lvm problems seems to be more of wetware issue than a source code
control tool issue.

Hopefully XFS will be able to keep ahead the problem of dramatically
code bases by staying active with Linus's releases.

> Dan Kegel <>:
> >I know very little about LVM, but from watching earlier projects
> >in the same situation you're in now, the path you need to follow
> >seems clear:
> > Stop using CVS internally for development.
> > It makes checking in changes without submitting them to
> > Linus too easy.
> >To get sync'd back up, *start with the standard kernel*,
> >and start generating clean, human-understandable patches one
> >at a time that bring it up to where you want.
> I am wondering how the XFS team plans on avoiding the same problems once
> XFS becomes part of the kernel. Is there potential for problems with SGI
> "losing control" over the source or direction of XFS once Linus puts it in
> his tree?
> How does the above comment relate to the XFS team's plans on patches to
> XFS and related areas once XFS is in?
> Just want to get these issues into the air before rancor and ill will
> spread...
> P.S. XFS has been extremely solid and has saved me a lot of time waiting
> for fscks. I am really impressed by the professionalism of the XFS team.
> Hopefully I can contribute soon - working on a slackware boot/modules/root
> disk set for XFS.
> James Rich

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:26    [W:0.032 / U:0.656 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site