[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: bug database braindump from the kernel summit
    Oliver Xymoron wrote:
    > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > On Sun, 1 Apr 2001, David Lang wrote:
    > > > if we want to get the .config as part of the report then we need to make
    > > > it part of the kernel in some standard way (the old /proc/config flamewar)
    > > > it's difficult enough sometimes for the sysadmin of a box to know what
    > > > kernel is running on it, let alone a bug reporting script.
    > >
    > > Let's hope it's not a flamewar, but here goes :)
    > >
    > > We -need- .config, but /proc/config seems like pure bloat.
    > As a former proponent of /proc/config (I wrote one of the much-debated
    > patches), I tend to agree. Debian's make-kpkg does the right thing, namely
    > treating .config the same way it treats System-map, putting it in the
    > package and eventually installing it in /boot/config-x.y.z. If Redhat's
    > kernel-install script did the same it would rapidly become a non-issue.

    How about /lib/modules/$(uname -r)/build/.config ? It's already there.


    The Daemons lurk and are dumb. -- Emerson
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:22    [W:0.020 / U:65.472 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site