lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Apr]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [test-PATCH] Re: [QUESTION] 2.4.x nice level
    On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 12:53:16PM -0300, Rik van Riel wrote:
    > On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Rik van Riel wrote:
    >
    > > OK, here it is. It's nothing like montavista's singing-dancing
    > > scheduler patch that does all, just a really minimal change that
    > > should stretch the nice levels to yield the following CPU usage:
    > >
    > > Nice 0 5 10 15 19
    > > %CPU 100 56 25 6 1
    >
    > PID USER PRI NI SIZE SWAP RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
    > 980 riel 17 0 296 0 296 240 R 54.1 0.5 54:19 loop
    > 1005 riel 16 5 296 0 296 240 R N 27.0 0.5 0:34 loop
    > 1006 riel 17 10 296 0 296 240 R N 13.5 0.5 0:16 loop
    > 1007 riel 18 15 296 0 296 240 R N 4.5 0.5 0:05 loop
    > 987 riel 20 19 296 0 296 240 R N 0.4 0.5 0:25 loop

    How does this scale to negative nice levels? Afaik it should, in some way.
    (I don't mean that it's wrong in this state, i'm just asking).

    regards,
    Balazs.
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:25    [W:0.024 / U:31.276 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site