[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: kernel lock contention and scalability

Manfred Spraul [] wrote:
> > lock contention work would be appreciated. I'm aware of timer scalability
> > work ongoing at, but is anyone
> > working on reducing sem_ids contention?
> Is that really a problem?
> The contention is high, but the actual lost time is quite small.

I agree it isn't a major performance problem under that workload. But, I
thought since the contention was high that other workloads which may
utilize it more might have shown it to be a significant problem.

> I've attached 2 changes that might reduce the contention, but it's just
> an idea, completely untested.

Thanks for the insight into the sempahore subsystem and the suggested fixes.

Jonathan Lahr
IBM Linux Technology Center
Beaverton, Oregon

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.078 / U:16.448 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site