lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: Linux connectivity trashed.
    On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Richard B. Johnson wrote:

    >snipped<

    First mistake:
    your security administrator relied on the firewall for protection.
    It is an _aid_ to security; not the 'be all and end all'. IOW, the hosts
    weren't hardened to resist penetration in case the firewall didn't cover
    it.

    Second mistake:
    your security administrator didn't make known the changes taking
    place, so that clueful users could have taken some preventative steps on
    their UNIX boxes.

    Third mistake:
    your security administrator either didn't know about; didn't care
    about; or didn't act on security problems for linux and solaris -- which
    have been posted, discussed, and addressed on many general or OS-specific
    security lists.

    Fourth mistake:
    your security administrator, rather than address the problems, is
    sticking his head in the sand and mumbling 'Windows' -- which, as an OS,
    is a christmas tree where every bauble says 'please hack me!'.

    In short, your security administrator needs to be dragged out, shot, and
    left hanging by the front door as a warning to his replacement.

    Or, at least fired.

    --
    -- John E. Jasen (jjasen1@umbc.edu)
    -- In theory, theory and practise are the same. In practise, they aren't.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.023 / U:30.080 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site