[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [26]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: CML1 cleanup patch, take 2
    Tom Rini wrote:
    > On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 09:50:53AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
    > > PPC guys: this is a gratuitous renaming change that is not required.
    > > If you have been following the "CML1 cleanup patch" thread, you see that
    > > Eric is blindly dictating policy when he says that CONFIG_[0-9] needs to
    > > be cleaned up.

    > The counter point to this is what does "CONFIG_6xx" or 8xx mean? It's as bad
    > as CONFIG_Mxxx imho :)

    No argument.. :) I definitely encourage namespace cleanup in 2.5 -- but
    please don't change an identifier just because it begins with a numeric
    prefix... Change it because it needs to be changed.

    Best regards,


    Jeff Garzik | May you have warm words on a cold evening,
    Building 1024 | a full moon on a dark night,
    MandrakeSoft | and a smooth road all the way to your door.
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.021 / U:6.632 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site