Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Fri, 23 Mar 2001 12:29:20 -0300 (BRST) | | From | Rik van Riel <> | | Subject | Re: regression testing |
| |
On Fri, 23 Mar 2001, Horst von Brand wrote: > Jonathan Morton <chromi@cyberspace.org> said: > > >- automated heavy stress testing > > > This would be an interesting one to me, from a benchmarking POV. I'd like > > to know what my hardware can really do, for one thing - it's all very well > > saying this box can do X Whetstones and has a 100Mbit NIC, but it's a much > > more solid thing to be able to say "my box handled the official Foobar > > stress-test in Y hours, handling Z widgets per second". > > Which would tell you exactly that, nothing more and nothing less.
But if we get 500 people to test _different_ things on a regular basis, we might be able to get more meaningful results.
regards,
Rik -- Virtual memory is like a game you can't win; However, without VM there's truly nothing to lose...
http://www.surriel.com/ http://www.conectiva.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com.br/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |