lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    From
    Date
    SubjectRe: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel

    george anzinger writes:
    > By the by, if a preemption lock is all that is needed the patch defines
    > it and it is rather fast (an inc going in and a dec & test comming
    > out). A lot faster than a spin lock with its "LOCK" access. A preempt
    > lock does not need to be "LOCK"ed because the only contender is the same
    > cpu.

    So we would have to invoke this thing around every set of
    smp_processor_id() references?

    Later,
    David S. Miller
    davem@redhat.com
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.042 / U:94.452 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site