[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel

    Keith Owens writes:
    > Or have I missed something?

    Nope, it is a fundamental problem with such kernel pre-emption
    schemes. As a result, it would also break our big-reader locks
    (see include/linux/brlock.h).

    Basically, anything which uses smp_processor_id() would need to
    be holding some lock so as to not get pre-empted.

    David S. Miller
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.020 / U:35.012 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site