[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH for 2.5] preemptible kernel
    On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Keith Owens wrote:
    > I misread the code, but the idea is still correct. Add a preemption
    > depth counter to each cpu, when you schedule and the depth is zero then
    > you know that the cpu is no longer holding any references to quiesced
    > structures.

    A task that has been preempted is on the run queue and can be
    rescheduled on a different CPU, so I can't see how a per-CPU counter
    would work. It seems to me that you would need a per run queue
    counter, like the example I gave in a previous posting.

    Nigel Gamble
    Mountain View, CA, USA.

    MontaVista Software

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
    ©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean