[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRE: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?
    On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Torrey Hoffman wrote:

    > IIRC, when this discussion of swap size first came up, the general
    > conclusion was NOT that you should have swap = 2 * RAM, but that you
    > should have swap(2.4.x) = 2 * swap(2.2.x), that is, twice as much swap
    > as you did under 2.2.x.

    it seems to me that in 2.2.x it looks like this:

    total usage == swap + RAM
    under 2.4.x it looks like:
    total usage == swap

    > So if you never swapped at all under 2.2.x, you should not need any
    > swap space in 2.4.x either.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [W:0.020 / U:1.548 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site