[lkml]   [2001]   [Mar]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: Is swap == 2 * RAM a permanent thing?
IIRC, when this discussion of swap size first came up, the general 
conclusion was NOT that you should have swap = 2 * RAM, but that you
should have swap(2.4.x) = 2 * swap(2.2.x), that is, twice as much swap
as you did under 2.2.x.

So if you never swapped at all under 2.2.x, you should not need any
swap space in 2.4.x either.

Is this correct?

Also, what would be the consequences of not having "enough" swap?
Just OOM faster? Or more serious than that?

I have 512MB of RAM and rarely swap, so normally have just a 256MB
swap partition. Is this bad? It seems to work fine...


Torrey Hoffman
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:29    [from the cache]
©2003-2014 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital Ocean