Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 9 Feb 2001 13:10:33 +0100 (MET) | From | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Re: UP APIC reenabling vs. cpu type detection o |
| |
On Fri, 9 Feb 2001, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> Unfortunately both these ways needs intimate knowledge of how UP NMI > watchdog works in each kernel, and it is incompatible with other > perfctr uses. Probably I'll switch perfctr delivery to some real > maskable interrupt while VMware VM owns CPU - if it is possible. > Then interrupt should be still pending after VM does __sti().
Why do you need to mask NMI at all?
-- + Maciej W. Rozycki, Technical University of Gdansk, Poland + +--------------------------------------------------------------+ + e-mail: macro@ds2.pg.gda.pl, PGP key available +
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |