Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Fix for include/linux/fs.h in 2.4.0 kernels | From | Graham Murray <> | Date | 03 Feb 2001 10:09:39 +0000 |
| |
Keith Owens <kaos@ocs.com.au> writes:
> This has all been thrashed out before. Read the threads > > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu/2000-month-07/msg04096.html > http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg18256.html
I don't think that these address my question. I was asking about when building (upgrading) glibc from source. I believe that the glibc headers are "derived" from the kernel against which it is built. So, irrespective of what the glibc maintainers do, would it be advisable for the user to remove the symlinks and copy the directories from the kernel tree and into /usr/include? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |