[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [rfc] Near-constant time directory index for Ext2

    > To have O(1) you've to have the number of hash entries > number of files and a
    > really good hasing function.

    No, if you enlarge the hash table twice (and re-hash everything) every time the
    table fills up, the load factor of the table keeps small and everything is O(1)
    amortized, of course if you have a good hashing function. If you are really
    smart and re-hash incrementally, you can get O(1) worst case complexity, but
    the multiplicative constant is large.

    > To be sincere, here is pretty daylight :)

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:17    [W:0.021 / U:2.204 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site