Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:51:14 -0600 (CST) | From | Michael E Brown <> | Subject | Re: block ioctl to read/write last sector |
| |
Martin,
It looks like the numbers we picked for our respective IOCTLs conflict. I think I can change mine to the next higher since your patch seems to have been around longer. What is the general way to deal with these conflicts?
-- Michael
On 13 Feb 2001, Martin K. Petersen wrote:
> >>>>> "Andries" == Andries Brouwer <Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl> writes: > > Andries> Anyway, an ioctl just to read the last sector is too silly. > Andries> An ioctl to change the blocksize is more reasonable. > > I actually sent you a patch implementing this some time ago, remember? > We need it for XFS... > > Patch against 2.4.2-pre3 follows. > >
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |