lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Feb]   [13]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] swapin flush cache bug
    Russell King wrote:
    > Unless someone else (Rik/DaveM) says otherwise, it is my understanding
    > that any IO for page P will only ever be a write to disk. Therefore,
    > when you get a copy of the page from the swap cache, the physical memory
    > for that page is the same as it was when the process was using it last.
    [...]
    > The data from memory will still be up to date though. However, I agree
    > that you will end up with cache aliases. I will also end up with cache
    > aliases. The question now is, do these aliases really matter?
    >
    > On my caches, the answer is no because they're not marked dirty, and
    > therefore will get dropped from the cache without writeback to memory.
    >
    > If your cache doesn't write back clean cache data to memory, then you
    > should also behave well.

    Yes, that's the difference. It's write back cache, in my case.
    --
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.024 / U:0.040 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site