Messages in this thread | | | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium | Date | 9 Dec 2001 14:15:22 -0800 |
| |
Followup to: <20011209141408.A17671@zero> By author: Tom Vier <tmv5@home.com> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > according to the putc man page in debian stable, it takes the same args as > fputc. maybe it varies by glibc version (mine is 2.1.3-19). i guess anyone > using putc better use autoconf. also, "unix system programming for SVr4" > says the only difference is that putc is an inlined macro version of fputc. >
Nevermind. I was thinking about putc() and putchar(), additionally confused by the annoying fact that fputs() is to putc() as puts() is to putchar()... makes no fscking sense.
-hpa -- <hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |