lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [9]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [OT] fputc vs putc Re: horrible disk thorughput on itanium
Date
Followup to:  <20011209141408.A17671@zero>
By author: Tom Vier <tmv5@home.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> according to the putc man page in debian stable, it takes the same args as
> fputc. maybe it varies by glibc version (mine is 2.1.3-19). i guess anyone
> using putc better use autoconf. also, "unix system programming for SVr4"
> says the only difference is that putc is an inlined macro version of fputc.
>

Nevermind. I was thinking about putc() and putchar(), additionally
confused by the annoying fact that fputs() is to putc() as puts() is
to putchar()... makes no fscking sense.

-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt <amsp@zytor.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.154 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site