lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] 2.4.16 kernel/printk.c (per processorinitializationcheck)
>>>>> On Sat, 8 Dec 2001 11:27:19 +0000 (GMT), Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> said:

>> I'm no x86 expert, but I have the impression that
>> current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy will be invalid (probably 0)
>> until smp_store_cpu_info() is called in smp_callin(). If so, a
>> console driver using udelay() might not work properly. I suspect
>> there are other issues, but this is just based on looking at the
>> x86 source code for 5 minutes.

Alan> x86_udelay_tsc wont have been set at that point so the main
Alan> timer is still being used.

x86 does use current_cpu_data.loops_per_jiffy in the non-TSC case, no?

--david
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site