[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: horrible disk thorughput on itanium
    > You can be thread-safe without sucking dead baby donkeys through a straw.
    > I already mentioned two possible ways to fix it so that you have locking
    > when you need to, and no locking when you don't.

    Your proposals sound rather dangerous. They would silently break recompiled
    threaded programs that need the locking and don't use -D__REENTRANT (most
    people do not seem to use it). I doubt the possible pain from that is
    worth it for speeding up an basically obsolete interface like putc.

    i.e. if someone wants speed they definitely shouldn't use putc()

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.019 / U:83.220 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site