| From | John Stoffel <> | Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2001 11:31:10 -0500 | Subject | Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 |
| |
Christoph> I still strongly object to it and I know lots of kernel Christoph> hackers are the same opinion.
I'm not a hacker, but I think it's a good thing to move to CML2. I've tested it and it's got some nice features. The Python issue I don't think is too onerous to require of people. And wasn't there someone out there porting CML2 to straight C code?
Why are people so wedded to the CML1 language spec anyway?
John John Stoffel - Senior Unix Systems Administrator - Lucent Technologies stoffel@lucent.com - http://www.lucent.com - 978-952-7548 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|