Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 05 Dec 2001 02:26:59 +0100 (CET) | From | Andreas Steinmetz <> | Subject | Re: kapm-idled |
| |
Hi, the problem is that kapm-idled and the idle task are both trying to handle the system idle time. I did send a patch correcting this weird behaviour for revision to Alan Cox a few days ago but until now there's no reaction from him. Oh, and there's more problems with kapm-idled. Think of a task like kmix that is ready to run every fraction of HZ to do some bookkeeping. Now look at the kapm-idled code. If both run in sync, e.g. they are ready to run during the same time slice kapm-idled will never do bios idle calls as there's always at least one task ready to run and this is then accounted as a 'heavily loaded system'. If you want to have a look at the patch please let me know though it may take a few days. I have to recover a system suffering from severe bit errors due to a memory module having gone south very slowly and quiet.
On 04-Dec-2001 Gert Menke wrote: > Hi, > > On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 09:45:44PM +0100, Dave Jones wrote: >> http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s14-1 > Sorry, I should have read the FAQ first. > > But it is still annoying that kapm-idled claims to use that much system > ressources when it isn't. When my system is idle it should say ~100% idle, > not ~50% system. Right? > Is there an easy way to fix this? Or a good reason not to? > > Greetings > Gert > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ >
Andreas Steinmetz D.O.M. Datenverarbeitung GmbH - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |