[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] improve spinlock debugging
    Nigel Gamble wrote:
    > On Tue, 4 Dec 2001, george anzinger wrote:
    > > For example, preemption currently counts
    > > up on spin_lock and disable irq, counting the spin_lockirq twice. In
    > That's not correct: we don't count it twice because we don't count
    > local_irq_disable etc., only the spin locks. Because...
    > > (Oh, and since the irq
    > > inhibits preemption all by itself, we don't need to count it either.)
    > we don't.

    Right, but we do count spin_lockirq (just once). See other email, this

    Real time sched:
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:13    [W:0.021 / U:9.224 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site