Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 4 Dec 2001 18:30:45 +0100 | From | Christoph Hellwig <> | Subject | Re: [kbuild-devel] Converting the 2.5 kernel to kbuild 2.5 |
| |
On Tue, Dec 04, 2001 at 11:18:38AM -0600, Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote: > As far as CML2 versus an mconfig-based solution, I am tilted towards CML2, > as it is simply a better language. I would be happy with either choice > if Linus made one of those choices. I would be unhappy if 2.6/3.0 > continued to ship with Configure/menuconfig/xconfig.
Indepenand of wether 2.6 will use CML1 or CML2 I hope it won't ship with the actual config tool. It's so much nicer to have mconfig compiled once in /usr/bin instead of compiling menuconfig all the time in the tree.
No to mention it's much easier to propagate bug fixes this way..
Christoph
-- Of course it doesn't work. We've performed a software upgrade. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |