[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [patch] Re: Framebuffer...Why oh Why???

    On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, Timothy Covell wrote:
    > When X11 locks up, I can still kill it and my box lives. When
    > framebuffers crash, their is no recovery save rebooting. Back in 1995
    > I thought that linux VTs and X11 implemenation blew Solaris out of the
    > water, and now we want throw away our progress? I'm still astounded
    > by the whole "oooh I can see a penquin while I boot-up" thing?
    > Granted, frame buffers have usage in embedded systems, but do they
    > really have to be so deeply integrated??

    They aren't.

    No sane person should use frame buffers if they have the choice.

    Like your mama told you: "Just say no". Use text-mode and X11, and be

    Some people don't have the choice, of course.


    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.020 / U:83.004 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site