Messages in this thread |  | | | Date | Sun, 30 Dec 2001 12:47:05 -0800 | | From | J Sloan <> | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ... |
| |
Timothy Covell wrote:
>Ummm, on my Dual P-III (650MHz with 524988416 Bytes), my current Seti >efficiency is 5.35 CpF. That's a tad high/slower than an Ultra Sparc IIi >according to their stats. So, it would appear that being SMP is hurting my >performance a bit. Unless that is that you meant to run a seti instance for >each CPU? And this reminds me of how "make -j3 bzlilo" is slower than >"make -j2 bzlilo". > Eh?
On my 4-way ppro, make -j4 is much faster than a simple "make" for kernel compilation. Almost linearly so -
This is with recent 2.4.1x kernels BTW on Red Hat 7.1/7.2
Sorry to hear of your bizzare experiences - but then again, maybe you're running a 2.2.x kernel or something?
cu
jjs
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |