lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: State of the new config & build system
    On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 03:44:10PM +1100, Keith Owens wrote:
    > What Mr. Fishtank seems to overlook is that kbuild 2.5 is far more
    > flexible and accurate than 2.4, including features that lots of people
    > want, like separate source and object trees.

    I don't see the masses, or, well, anybody on lkml, clamoring for this.

    IIRC from the kernel summit SGI was the only entity clamoring for this.


    > Now that the overall
    > kbuild design is correct, the core code can be rewritten for speed.
    > And that will be done a couple of weeks after kbuild 2.5 goes into the
    > kernel, then I expect kbuild 2.5 to be faster than kbuild 2.4 even on
    > full builds.

    Ok... you want kbuild into 2.5 ASAP, only to submit a rewrite two weeks later?

    If so it makes even less sense to get kbuild into 2.5.x now.

    Jeff


    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.041 / U:89.644 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site