[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH] Balanced Multi Queue Scheduler ...
    Davide Libenzi wrote:
    > On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Dieter [iso-8859-15] Nützel wrote:
    > > Davide worte:
    > > > There's a bug fix and the use of the Time Slice Split Scheduler inside the
    > > > local CPUs schedulers. Versions from 0.46 to 0.52 are broken by the fixed
    > > > bug so testers should use this version :
    > > >
    > > >
    > >
    > > Sorry, if someone asks this before but do you think that you get some stuff
    > > out of it for 2.4.xx?
    > >
    > > Your numbers for the 8 SMP system are great.
    > > Can't wait to do some tests on my poor single 1 GHz Athlon II and soon dual
    > > Athlon MP/XP 1600+ on an MS 6501 (AMD 760MPX).
    > >
    > > Maybe my MP3/Ogg-Vorbis hiccup during dbench 32+ are solved?
    > > Currently running latest 2.4.17+preempt (do think that can be mixed with your
    > > new scheduler?).
    > The new patch need ver >= 2.5.2-pre3 because Linus merged the Time Slice
    > Split Scheduler and making it to apply to 2.4.x could be a pain in the b*tt.
    > Yes, as i expected numbers on big SMP are very good but still i don't
    > think that this can help you with your problem.

    I would expect the audio dropouts to be due to disk read latencies
    and insufficiently large buffers in the audio app, and/or failure
    of that audio app to mlock itself down.

    If it's scheduling latency, which I doubt, I yesterday put out
    a 2.4.17 low-latency patch which has a worst-case latency which is
    two orders of magnitude less that the preemptive kernel's. The
    lock-break patch will improve the preempt patch's worst case.

    > It'd be nice to have inside local_irq_disable()/enable() a cycle counter
    > sampler to see what is the worst case path with disabled irqs.

    This tool needs a bit of maintenance work, but it can measure and identify
    the source of worst-case interrupt latencies quite successfully.

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.036 / U:54.340 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site