![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Matthew Dharm wrote: > > Hrm... > > Does this apply to usb-storage also? Under what conditions do you need to > hold the io_request_lock when calling the done function? > That's scsi_old_done(). I don't think scsi_done() cares whether io_request_lock is held or not. And io_request_lock *must* be held by the caller of scsi_old_done() - it assumes this. I think we'd have heard by now if usb was getting this wrong. Looks like it's using scsi_done(), yes? - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||