[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: The direction linux is taking
    On Sat, 29 Dec 2001, Larry McVoy wrote:

    > On Sat, Dec 29, 2001 at 05:29:52PM -0600, Oliver Xymoron wrote:
    > > > Is it really true that there are any significant number of patches
    > > > submitted that don't even compile?
    > >
    > > No
    > OK, so there are no significant numbers of patches that the patchbot will
    > eliminate, by your admission.

    Except for the ones that get garbage collected after each new kernel
    release WHEN THE VALIDITY OF THE QUEUE IS RECHECKED. Which will catch all
    the duplicates or conflicts that were queued but not applied. See original
    pseudo-code (which happened to be Python). And filtering by checking for
    apply/compile was only half of the original suggestion.

    > So what's the point? What is the problem you have solved? And where's
    > the code? This sounds like you have whittled it down to a cgi-script of
    > about 100 lines of perl. How about building it and demonstrating the
    > usefulness rather than telling us how great it is going to be?

    The original suggestion (about the possibility of compile-testing patches
    incrementally) was dependent on kbuild and CML2 being in the kernel
    already, but I do have a proof-of-concept for the rest in the works.

    "Love the dolphins," she advised him. "Write by W.A.S.T.E.."

    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to
    More majordomo info at
    Please read the FAQ at

     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.024 / U:45.164 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site