[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: editorial policy
On Thursday, 27 December 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> On December 27, 2001 12:34 am, Dominik Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Although I thought there was an agreement that decimal kilobyte is kB,
> > and binary kilobyte is KiB, decimal megabyte is MB, binary megabyte is MB
> > and so on, wasn't there?
> Not in my book. As far as I'm concerned, somebody who tells me that one KB
> of memory or disk is 1,000 bytes is a liar. When a disk manufacturer chooses
> to interpret KB in such a way as to make their disk seem bigger, I just say
> to myself "ok, they lied, that's what they do, they're in business and they
> don't care". Now could we just ignore the self-serving doublespeak
> promulgated by greedy manufacturers, and continue using KB please?
> Kilo, as in memory -> 1024
> Kilo, as in distance or weight -> 1,000
> Difficult?
> /me wonders when the kibblebytes thread is going to end

/me wonders when people will learn to read more carefully
(no offense intended) :-)

If you look at my post more closely, you'll see I used `kB' (that's small
k and capital B) for decimal kilobyte. I would never suggest using `KB'
(that's capital K and capital B) for it. I do agree that `KB' is traditionally
used for binary kilobytes, but what about MB, GB and so on? These _are_
ambiguous. I am in favour of using Ki, Mi and Gi for binary quantities.

"The Universe doesn't give you any points for doing things that are easy."
-- Sheridan to Garibaldi in Babylon 5:"The Geometry of Shadows"
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rathann(at)>
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:1.907 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site