lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [more markup]  [less markup]  [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
DateThu, 27 Dec 2001 11:14:15 -0700
FromAndreas Dilger <>
SubjectRe: [Ext2-devel] [RFC] [PATCH] Clean up fs.h union for ext2
On Dec 27, 2001  04:21 +0100, Daniel Phillips wrote:
> The strategy is to abstract all references to the struct inode union through 
> an inline function:
> 
> 	static inline struct ext2_inode_info *ext2_i (struct inode *inode)
> 	{
> 		return &(inode->u.ext2_inode_info);
> 	}
> 
> There is some grist here for the mills of language lawyers here.  Note the 
> compilation warning:
> 
>    ialloc.c:336: warning: passing arg 1 of `ext2_i' discards qualifiers from 
>    pointer target type

Why not just declare ext2_i like the following?  It _should_ work:

static inline struct ext2_inode_info *ext2_i(const struct inode *inode)
{
	return &(inode->u.ext2_inode_info);
}

Minor nit: this is already done for the ext3 code, but it looks like:

#define EXT3_I	(&((inode)->u.ext3_i))

We already have the EXT3_SB, so I thought I would be consistent with it:

#define EXT3_SB	(&((sb)->u.ext3_sb))

Do people like the inline version better?  Either way, I would like to make
the ext2 and ext3 codes more similar, rather than less.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 12:14    [from the cache]
©2003-2008