Messages in this thread | | | From | Keith Owens <> | Subject | Re: How to fix false positives on references to discarded text/data? | Date | Mon, 24 Dec 2001 22:02:45 +1100 |
| |
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001 11:05:00 +0100 (CET), Kai Germaschewski <kai@tp1.ruhr-uni-bochum.de> wrote: >According to my reading of the docs and also to my testing, .subsection 0 >and .previous should be equivalent here. But .subsection 0 may be cleaner.
As I read the gas info text, .subsection changes the current entry on top of stack, it does not stack a new section/subsection pair. .previous swaps the top of stack with the previous top of stack. I suspect that you would get different results if there was more than one section on the stack. In any case, .subsection 0 is "obviously correct".
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |