lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch] Assigning syscall numbers for testing
Russell King wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 07:05:31PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > it. However, I think it needs to be allocated *regardless* of whether Linus
> > > takes the patch into his kernel. Even if the patch is simply used outside
> > > Linus's kernel, it still needs the allocation to truly be safe.
> >
> > Negative numbers are safe until Linus has 2^31 syscalls, at which point
> > quite frankly we would have a few other problems including the fact that
> > the syscall table won't fit in kernel mapped memory.
>
> Please leave the allocation of the exact number space to the port
> maintainers discression.

Why not assign 1 syscall that gets the name of an experimental syscall
as its first argument and does the demultiplexing?

Ciao, ET.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans