lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks ...
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:36:07PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
> > My understanding of the POSIX standard is the the highest priority
> > task(s) are to get the cpu(s) using the standard calls. If you want to
> > deviate from this I think the standard allows extensions, but they IMHO
> > should be requested, not the default, so I would turn your flag around
> > to force LOCAL, not GLOBAL.
>
> So, you're basically saying that for a better standard compliancy it's
> better to have global preemption policy by default. And having users to
> request rt tasks localization explicitly. It's fine for me.

Can you please cite the passaaages in the standrd you have in mind?

>
>
>
>
> - Davide
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans. Advertise on this site