lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [RFC] Scheduler issue 1, RT tasks ...
    On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 02:36:07PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote:
    > > My understanding of the POSIX standard is the the highest priority
    > > task(s) are to get the cpu(s) using the standard calls. If you want to
    > > deviate from this I think the standard allows extensions, but they IMHO
    > > should be requested, not the default, so I would turn your flag around
    > > to force LOCAL, not GLOBAL.
    >
    > So, you're basically saying that for a better standard compliancy it's
    > better to have global preemption policy by default. And having users to
    > request rt tasks localization explicitly. It's fine for me.

    Can you please cite the passaaages in the standrd you have in mind?

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > - Davide
    >
    >
    > -
    > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:18    [W:0.021 / U:0.916 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site