Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 24 Dec 2001 02:04:50 +0100 | From | Christian Ohm <> | Subject | Re: file corruption in 2.4.16/17 |
| |
> none of that is meaningful (genuine companies ship invalid cables, > and the 20 could easily have had a lower max udma mode, etc.)
hmmm, i'll try a new one after christmas... the bios showed them both as 'udma 66'.
> are they both on the same channel? also, when you boot, do you see > a message about the "athlon bug stomper"? (which actually corrects > a bogus kt133/etal hostbridge setting.)
they are on the same channel. and i've never seen a message like this.
> I can't imagine any reason to use the preemption patch, since it > completely corrupts all atomicity guarantees that the kernel has > been codd on. there definitely is no problem with large disks and > via (and 80G is certainly not a large disk any more.)
well, plain 2.4.17 corrupted files, too.
bye christian ohm - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |