lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: aio
    On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 12:07:21AM -0500, Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@redhat.com> wrote:
    | >[...]
    | > However, heavily threaded apps regardless of language are hardly likely
    | > to disappear; threads are the natural way to write many many things. And
    | > if the kernel implements threads as on Linux, then the scheduler will
    | > become much more important to good performance.
    |
    | Cameron seems to be arguing with DaveM,

    About the wrong things, but no matter.

    | but subconsciously he
    | only supports DaveM's point about AIO: Java cannot make use
    | of AIO, so that's one (large or small, important or unimportant)
    | group of applications down from the count.

    You're sure? Java _authors_ can't make use of it, but Java _implementors_
    probably have good reason to want it ...

    | Just trying to keep on topic :)

    Whatever for?
    --
    Cameron Simpson, DoD#743 cs@zip.com.au http://www.zip.com.au/~cs/

    Reaching consensus in a group often is confused with finding the right
    answer. - Norman Maier
    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:4.174 / U:0.104 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site