Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 17 Dec 2001 12:30:45 +0000 | From | Sean Hunter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] kill(-1,sig) |
| |
Doh!</slaps head>
Sean
On Mon, Dec 17, 2001 at 12:06:30PM +0000, Matthew Kirkwood wrote: > On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Sean Hunter wrote: > > > > Hmm. Looking at killall5 source I see > > > > > > kill(-1, STOP); > > > for(each proc with p.sid!=my_sid) kill(proc, sig); > > > kill(-1, CONT); > > > > > > I guess STOP will stop killall5 too? Not good indeed. > > > Couldn't it just do: > [..] > > ... in other words, block signals, do the killing, then unblock? > > SIGSTOP and SIGKILL can't be blocked. > > Matthew. > > - > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ > - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |