lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16


On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dan Maas wrote:

> > > Yes, throughtput-only tests will have their numbers degradated with the
> > > change applied on 2.4.16-pre2.
> > >
> > > The whole thing is just about tradeoffs: Interactivity vs throughtput.
> > >
> > > I'm not going to destroy interactivity for end users to get beatiful
> > > dbench numbers.
> >
> > Latency is more of an issue for end user machines.
>
> Time for CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_THROUGHPUT / CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_LATENCY ?

That would be the best thing to do, yes.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans