lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2001]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: IO degradation in 2.4.17-pre2 vs. 2.4.16


    On Tue, 11 Dec 2001, Dan Maas wrote:

    > > > Yes, throughtput-only tests will have their numbers degradated with the
    > > > change applied on 2.4.16-pre2.
    > > >
    > > > The whole thing is just about tradeoffs: Interactivity vs throughtput.
    > > >
    > > > I'm not going to destroy interactivity for end users to get beatiful
    > > > dbench numbers.
    > >
    > > Latency is more of an issue for end user machines.
    >
    > Time for CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_THROUGHPUT / CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_LATENCY ?

    That would be the best thing to do, yes.

    -
    To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
    the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
    More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
    Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2005-03-22 13:14    [W:0.020 / U:0.264 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site