Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 10 Dec 2001 16:13:32 -0800 (PST) | Subject | Re: TCP LAST-ACK state broken in 2.4.17-pre2 | From | "David S. Miller" <> |
| |
From: kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 21:34:47 +0300 (MSK)
Dave, "official" patch will follow later. I must think about some marginal effect in TCP_CLOSE_WAIT and TCP_CLOSING, which can break out of switch too. Duh, do specs say something about segments with seqs above fin? I do not remember.
A socket in a synchronized state is required to enforce legal sequence numbers, is it not? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |