![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
"David S. Miller" wrote: > > From: Andrew Morton <akpm@zip.com.au> > Date: Thu, 08 Nov 2001 22:54:30 -0800 > > I played with that earlier in the year. Shrinking the hash table > by a factor of eight made no measurable difference to anything on > a Pentium II. The hash distribution was all over the place though. > Lots of buckets with 1-2 pages, lots with 12-13. > > What is the distribution when you don't shrink the hash > table? > Well on my setup, there are more hash buckets than there are pages in the system. So - basically empty. If memory serves me, never more than two pages in a bucket. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:13 [W:0.226 / U:0.420 seconds] ©2003-2008 Jasper Spaans | |||||||||||||