Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 8 Nov 2001 18:08:18 -0800 | From | Mike Fedyk <> | Subject | Re: [patch] scheduler cache affinity improvement for 2.4 kernels |
| |
On Thu, Nov 08, 2001 at 06:09:29PM -0800, Davide Libenzi wrote: > On Thu, 8 Nov 2001, Mike Fedyk wrote: > > > > The MQ scheduler has the same roots of the proposed one but has a longest > > > fast path due the try to make global scheduling decisions at every > > > schedule. > > > > Ahh, so that's why it hasn't been adopted... > > Changing the scheduler is not easy ( not to code patches but to make > everyone agree on the need of changing it ) and as i already said, it's > easier to force my cat to have a bath instead of Linus to change the > scheduler :) >
Hmm, let's see... You go to the trouble to keep to code tight, and cache optimized, even raid5 is choosing a little slower implementation for better cache properties, and then you go and kill it all with the scheduler... Yep, that makes sence. ;)
Mike - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |