Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 07 Nov 2001 18:40:21 +0000 | From | Anton Altaparmakov <> | Subject | Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs |
| |
At 15:23 07/11/2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > I just set up a RedHat 7.2 box with ext3, and after a few tests/chrashes, > > I see no difference at all. After a chrash, it really wants to run fsck > > anyway. I've tried ReiserFS before, with no fsck after chrashes - is this > >Umm RH 7.2 after an unexpected shutdown will give you a 5 second count down >when you can choose to force an fsck - ext3 doesnt need an fsck but >sometimes folks might want to force it thats all
Hm, while still on the default RH7.2 kernel using ext3 on all partitions I flicked the reset switch accidentally (wrong reset switch it was...) and when coming back up it fscked (I didn't touch anything - didn't even notice any 5 second thing but I wasn't looking at this screen) and it found two lost inodes (I got two entries in lost and found). So it still needs to fsck by the looks of it?
Anton
-- "I've not lost my mind. It's backed up on tape somewhere." - Unknown -- Anton Altaparmakov <aia21 at cam.ac.uk> (replace at with @) Linux NTFS Maintainer / WWW: http://linux-ntfs.sf.net/ ICQ: 8561279 / WWW: http://www-stu.christs.cam.ac.uk/~aia21/
- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |