Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: ext3 vs resiserfs vs xfs | Date | Wed, 7 Nov 2001 15:23:51 +0000 (GMT) | From | Alan Cox <> |
| |
> I just set up a RedHat 7.2 box with ext3, and after a few tests/chrashes, > I see no difference at all. After a chrash, it really wants to run fsck > anyway. I've tried ReiserFS before, with no fsck after chrashes - is this
Umm RH 7.2 after an unexpected shutdown will give you a 5 second count down when you can choose to force an fsck - ext3 doesnt need an fsck but sometimes folks might want to force it thats all - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |