![]() | |||||||||||||
Messages in this thread |
Alexander Viro wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Nov 2001, Alan Cox wrote: > > > Surely the answer if you want short term write speed and long term balancing > > is to use ext3 not ext2 and simply ensure that the relevant stuff goes to > > the journal (which will be nicely ordered) first. That will give you some > > buffering at least. > > Alan, the problem is present in ext3 as well as in all other FFS derivatives > (well, FreeBSD had tried to deal that stuff this Spring). > Yep. Once we're seek-bound on metadata and data, the occasional seek-and-squirt into the journal won't make much difference, and the other write patterns will be the same. Interestingly, current ext3 can do a 600 meg write in fifty seconds, whereas ext2 takes seventy. This will be related to the fact that ext3 just pumps all the buffers into submit_bh(), whereas ext2 fiddles around with all the write_locked_buffers() stuff. I think. Or the intermingling of indirects with data is tripping ext2 up. The additional seeking is audible. - - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ | ||||||||||||
| Last update: 2005-03-22 12:12 [from the cache] ©2003-2008 | |||||||||||||